Latest Posts
Search for:
Tag

manufacturing

Browsing

New York Appellate Court Affirms Entity‑Level QETC Requirements for Combined Groups

By , and 6 Mins Read

In Matter of Charter Communications, Inc. v New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal, CV-24-0971 the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department (New York’s intermediate appellate court, the “Court”) recently held that Charter Communications, Inc. and its combined affiliates were not eligible for the reduced qualified emerging technology company (“QETC”) corporate franchise tax rate. The Court agreed that each member of a combined group must independently meet the QETC definition for the group to…

Qualified New York Manufacturer Wins at New York Division of Tax Appeals: Use of Third-Party Subcontractor Did Not Affect Eligibility for State Franchise Tax Reduced Rate

By , , and 6 Mins Read

The New York Division of Tax Appeals recently ruled in favor of a taxpayer, E. & J. Gallo Winery, holding that it met the statutory requirements of a “Qualified New York Manufacturer” (“QNYM”) and was therefore entitled to a reduced corporation franchise tax rate. As a result of New York’s corporate tax reform, QNYMs are entitled to a reduced tax rate, including a 0% tax rate on their business income base beginning in 2014, for…

Louisiana Board of Tax Appeals Addresses Modern Manufacturing

By , , and 3 Mins Read

On September 8, 2022, the Louisiana Board of Tax Appeals (“Board”) granted a taxpayer’s motion for summary judgment in a case involving whether the taxpayer qualified as a manufacturer for purposes of Louisiana’s apportionment provisions.  Cervey LLC, f/k/a New – Tech Computer Systems LLC v. Secretary of Department of Revenue, Louisiana, La. BTA Docket No. 12272D (Sept. 8, 2022). The taxpayer’s business consisted primarily of three types of software: (1) software for maintaining health records…

A “Manufactured” Attack: Department Takes Aim at Contract Manufacturing and Redrafts the Tax Law in New Draft Regulations

By , , and 13 Mins Read

On the heels of its loss in Matter of TransCanada Facility USA, Inc. DTA NO. 827332, on May 14, the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance proposed draft regulations addressing the Article 9-A Franchise Tax treatment of Qualified New York Manufacturers (“QNYMs”).[1] These draft regulations, which are not currently in effect but which do shed light on the Department’s current thinking, amplify a position that the Department has taken in prior informal guidance and on audit regarding contract manufacturing arrangements and the scope of activities that constitute “manufacturing” that is not in the statute. The position that a taxpayer that engages in contract manufacturing cannot qualify as a QNYM is contrary to prior New York authorities addressing “manufacturing” in the investment tax credit context and contrary to judicial authorities defining “manufacturing” under relevant federal tax law. In addition, the draft regulations set out a new position—again, one not found in the statute—that “digital manufacturing” is not manufacturing, and that only manufacturing that results in the production of “tangible” goods will qualify for QNYM treatment.

Load More