A recent decision out of the Los Angeles County Superior Court marks a significant win for taxpayers involving the use of alternative apportionment and successful challenges to the Franchise Tax Board’s (“FTB”) regulations, which the court found to be inconsistent with the statute as applied. On February 26, 2026, the court in Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp. v. California Franchise Tax Board ordered the FTB (in a Proposed Statement of Decision, which becomes final after an…
Latest Posts
- California Court Allows Three‑Factor Formula based on Alternative Apportionment and Invalidity of Special Industry Regulation
- New York Appellate Court Affirms Entity‑Level QETC Requirements for Combined Groups
- 2026 State and Local Tax Amnesty Programs: What Businesses Need to Know
- New Year, New Taxes: Chicago Enacts Nation’s First Social Media Tax Among Other Changes
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Strikes Down Pittsburgh’s “Jock Tax” on Nonresident Performers
- A Decade After Tax Reform, New York City Proposes New Business Corporation Tax Regulations
- Indiana Generates A Position on Artificial Intelligence
- SALT Implications of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act
Recent Posts
In Matter of Charter Communications, Inc. v New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal, CV-24-0971 the New York Supreme…
Heading into 2026, several states are offering tax amnesty programs that can help businesses resolve outstanding liabilities with…
The City of Chicago begins its 2026 fiscal year with a new budget containing several key tax changes…
In a unanimous decision issued on September 25, 2025, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court invalidated the City of Pittsburgh’s…
The New York City (“City”) Department of Finance (“DOF”) has taken a significant step forward in implementing its…
Artificial intelligence, or more commonly AI, seems to be what everyone is talking about nowadays. Businesses are investing…