The California legislature is proposing a 7.25% tax on âdata extraction transactions in the stateâ through Senate Bill (âSBâ) 1327. If enacted, the bill would target businesses that monetize data extracted from users (e.g., social media companies, large search engines, online retailers, etc.). âData extraction transactionâ means: â(A) A taxpayer sells user information or access to users to advertisersâ andâ(B) The taxpayer engages in a barter by providing services to a user in full or partial…
The Illinois False Claims Act (“IFCA”) has been perpetually abused by parasitic litigants seeking to force businesses into unwarranted tax claims. In the latest example, The People ex rel. Stephen B. Diamond v. Henry Poole & Co., Ltd., the Illinois Appellate Court (the “Court”) rejected an action filed by a well-known IFCA litigant against a UK-based tailor, Henry Poole & Co (“Poole”), for failure to collect Illinois use tax on custom clothing sold and shipped…
Beginning November 1, 2021, the Louisiana Department of Revenue (âDepartmentâ) will be offering taxpayers the opportunity to participate in a voluntary transfer pricing âmanaged auditâ program (the âProgramâ). Pursuant to a recently released Department information bulletin, the purpose of the Program is to: Create an efficient and expedited resolution for corporate tax audits when transfer pricing issues exist; andProvide certainty and uniformity to taxpayers on the resolution of transfer pricing issues for open audit periods…
The City of Chicago recently issued nexus guidance and a limited safe harbor for City tax purposes in light of the U.S. Supreme Courtâs pivotal South Dakota v. Wayfair ruling and the State of Illinoisâ statutory economic nexus standards. True to form, the City implemented its new nexus standards by executive action via publication of a ânexus and safe harborâ âinformation bulletinâ on its website (available on the Cityâs website, here), as opposed to the Chicago City Council more formally (and more appropriately) adopting a new ordinance.