Latest Posts
Search for:
Tag

New York

Browsing

If at First You Don’t Succeed, Try Again: New York Proposes Yet Another Data Tax

By , and 4 Mins Read

As part of the growing trend of states seeking to tax digital activities and data, New York is considering yet another data tax proposal that would tax the collection of personal data for commercial purposes.  This latest proposal—which is contained in Senate Bill 4959—would impose a new excise tax “on the collection of consumer data of individual New York consumers by commercial data collectors.”  The tax would apply regardless of how the data is collected, whether by electronic or other means.  Under the proposal, “consumer data” is “any information that identifies, relates to, describes, is capable of being associated with, or could reasonably be linked with a consumer, whether directly submitted to the commercial data collector by the consumer or derived from other sources,” and a “consumer” includes individuals who purchase goods or services from a commercial data collector and individuals who use the services of a commercial data collector, whether charged for those services or not.  A “commercial data collector” is a “for-profit entity that: (i) collects, maintains, uses, processes, sells or shares consumer data in support of its business activities; and (ii) collects consumer data, other than consumer contact information, on more than one million individual New York consumers in a month within the calendar year.”  The bill would add the tax to a new section 186-h, within Article 9 of the New York Tax Law.

New York Administrative Law Judge Determines That Online Security Services Are Subject to Sales Tax

By , and 4 Mins Read

A recently published New York State Division of Tax Appeals Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) determination, Matter of SecureWorks, Inc., DTA Nos. 828328 & 828329 (N.Y. Div. Tax App. ALJ Div. Jan. 14, 2021) (“SecureWorks”) concluded that New York sales tax applies to certain online security services when such services are provided with respect to devices located in New York. The ALJ concluded that most of the IT security services provided by the taxpayer, SecureWorks, Inc.,…

New Year, New Digital and Data Tax Proposals

By , , and 6 Mins Read

State legislators have already proposed a number of digital and data tax bills in 2021, some of which are new proposals while others reintroduce proposals from previous legislative sessions.  The proposed bills fall into one of three categories: taxes on digital advertising services, taxes (or fees) targeting social media providers, and taxes on the sale or monetization of personal data.  Most of the proposals are in the early stages, but a Maryland bill originally introduced last year is moving closer to a legislative vote on whether to override the governor’s veto.

A “Manufactured” Attack: Department Takes Aim at Contract Manufacturing and Redrafts the Tax Law in New Draft Regulations

By , , and 13 Mins Read

On the heels of its loss in Matter of TransCanada Facility USA, Inc. DTA NO. 827332, on May 14, the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance proposed draft regulations addressing the Article 9-A Franchise Tax treatment of Qualified New York Manufacturers (“QNYMs”).[1] These draft regulations, which are not currently in effect but which do shed light on the Department’s current thinking, amplify a position that the Department has taken in prior informal guidance and on audit regarding contract manufacturing arrangements and the scope of activities that constitute “manufacturing” that is not in the statute. The position that a taxpayer that engages in contract manufacturing cannot qualify as a QNYM is contrary to prior New York authorities addressing “manufacturing” in the investment tax credit context and contrary to judicial authorities defining “manufacturing” under relevant federal tax law. In addition, the draft regulations set out a new position—again, one not found in the statute—that “digital manufacturing” is not manufacturing, and that only manufacturing that results in the production of “tangible” goods will qualify for QNYM treatment.

Load More