States continue to provide relief in response to the spread of the COVID-19 virus. This week, numerous states responded to the federal income tax filing extension, and we expect additional states to respond in the coming days. Some states are also offering relief for non-income business taxes, and much of the relief is limited to small- to mid-size businesses. Furthermore, COVID-19 is causing complications in property tax assessments, payments, and appeals.
The World Health Organization has officially declared the coronavirus outbreak to be a pandemic. In addition to the cost on human life, the rapid spread of COVID-19 has left a trail of economic damage affecting business revenues. COVID-19 has caused complete or partial shutdown of factories, supply chain disruptions, and labor shortages, and has impacted demand in certain industries. This impact will also be felt by U.S. state, and local governments.
The Utah Supreme Court handed taxpayers a victory on October 5, 2018 when it issued a unanimous (5-0) decision in the closely-watched Utah State Tax Commission v. Seeâs Candies, Inc., 2018 UT 57 (Oct. 5, 2018). The Court affirmed the district courtâs holding that the Utah State Tax Commissionâs (âCommissionâ) discretionary authority to reallocate a taxpayerâs income under Utah Code Section 59-7-113 (âSection 113â) is limited by the âarmâs-lengthâ standard set forth in the federal…
Baker McKenzie attended the U.S. Supreme Courtâs oral arguments yesterday in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Docket No. 17-494. At issue in the case is whether the Court should abrogate the physical presence nexus standard that it first articulated in National Bellas Hess v. Depât of Revenue, 386 U.S. 753 (1967), and later affirmed in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). The Courtâs decision could have a profound impact on sales and use tax nexus in the United States by altering the limitations currently imposed on a stateâs ability to require out-of-state retailers to collect such tax.